Monthly Leadership Brief - July Issue
The strongest schools do not enter a new academic year with more initiatives. They enter with greater clarity.
Read moreMonthly Leadership Brief - April Issue
By April, many KG classrooms appear to be progressing in both Arabic and English. Children recognize letters, repeat sounds, and participate confidently across both languages.
On the surface, this looks like balanced bilingual development.
Yet in early reading, exposure is not the same as progress. What matters is whether reading is being built clearly and systematically in each language.
This brief examines a common pattern: children beginning to read in English while Arabic remains dependent on recognition, repetition, or memorization — and how leaders can evaluate that clearly.
When children begin reading in one language but not the other, bilingualism itself is rarely the issue.
The deeper issue is instructional misalignment.
Strong early literacy depends on how clearly students are guided from letters to sounds, sounds to words, and words to meaning.
In many schools, English is taught through a structured phonics sequence, while Arabic is left to recognition, repetition, or familiarity.
As a result, students do not build two parallel reading systems. They build two different ones:
These patterns are subtle — but they determine whether reading becomes independent or remains fragile.
These indicators matter more than visible activity. They show whether students are learning to read — or learning to cope.
Red Flags
Instruction focuses on letter names or visual recognition rather than sounds.
One language follows structured phonics while the other relies on exposure or memorization.
Students succeed only with familiar or practiced words.
Green Flags
Sounds are taught first with clear letter–sound connections.
Both languages follow structured, cumulative phonics progression.
Students apply decoding to unfamiliar words in both languages.
These steps often reveal whether Arabic literacy is structured — or unintentionally left to memorization.
“Are we building independent readers in both languages — or only in one?”
Arabic is not inherently more difficult to read.
But when it is not taught through a structured approach to sounds and decoding, it can appear that way.
For schools aiming to improve outcomes, the focus should not be the language — but how reading is built.
From Insight to Implementation
Structured literacy works best when children move through a clear progression in every language they are learning. sMiles and Basamat show how decoding, sequencing, and cumulative reading development can be built clearly across English and Arabic.
Stay connected with Chapters & Co. Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive updates on new releases and special titles.
The strongest schools do not enter a new academic year with more initiatives. They enter with greater clarity.
Read moreThis month’s Literacy Channel brief explores how school leaders can interpret end-of-year literacy data with greater ...
Read moreDiscover how the sMiles literacy program helps children learn to read by connecting sounds, letters, decoding, compre...
Read moreAt Chapters & Co., we design science-based programs that nurture literacy, critical thinking, and creativity—helping every learner think, connect, and grow.
Chapters & Co. LLC FZ | Dubai, UAE | Boston, USA
info@chaptersnco.com | www.chaptersnco.com
© 2026 Chapters & Co.